In the most recent issue of PNAS,
the president of my alma mater, Ronald J. Donalds, discusses the disturbing
trend of decreased funding for young scientists saying, “The
departure of young scientists from the academic biomedical workforce in turn
poses grave risks for the future of science.”
Fig 1 from article: Percent of NIH R01 principal investigators and medical school faculty by age (1980 in pale and 2010 in bold). |
In the article he addresses several theories for why young
scientists aren’t receiving grants, including inherent bias in the grant
process towards more established scientists, the financial hardship placed on
institutions in supporting faculty, and the protracted postdoctoral training
period which increases the average age a scientist obtains a faculty position.
He goes on to address each point. In regards to the long training
periods he makes several suggestions. As it is well known and recorded that
there are far more postdoctoral researchers than available faculty positions,
Donalds calls for better career training. “To provide a true foundation of
support for early-stage scientists, we will need to construct a pathway to a
career in the biomedical sciences that is sustainable, humane and fair.” One
solution Donalds offers are more staff scientist positions at core facilities
in universities and research institutions.
Donalds also cites the need for “weaning our biomedical
workforce away from an overreliance on postdoctoral researchers.” A decade-old
report by the National Academy of Sciences suggested imposing a 5-year limit on
funding for postdocs, which Donalds suggests should be revisited. He also suggests
increased K99/R00 grants, which provide funding for postdoc training as well as
establishing their own independent career. Finally he says there is a need for “demystifying the R01”
as the most important factor for obtaining and retaining faculty.
No comments:
Post a Comment